Showing posts with label vendors. Show all posts
Showing posts with label vendors. Show all posts

Monday, May 11, 2009

Open Text acquires Vignette

Dateline 6th May 2009. Open Text announce in an Open Text acquisition press release the acquisition of Vignette on of the leading WCM players for the old days.

Vignette shareholders will receive US $8.00 in cash plus 0.1447 of an Open Text common share for every Vignette common share which equates to approximately US $12.70 at close of market on May 5, 2009. This represents a premium of approximately 74% above the 30 trading day average closing price of Vignette’s shares and approximately 41% above the most recent closing price. This values the transaction at approximately US $310 million.”

I had recently put up a post called where have all the vendors gone, dated the 17th April. At the end of this post I posed what will happen to Vignette, well we now know don’t we.

Open Text now eat the big V and the question is will they get indigestion over this dinner? Open Text have been on the acquisition trail over the last couple of years.

Given that 28% of Vignettes 2008 revenues were from new licences what have Open Text bought? A bunch of service contracts and the opportunity to convert customers?

However these are perilous times where customers will look to options. Good luck Open Text and goodbye Vignette, you were a leader once.

Friday, April 17, 2009

Where have all the vendors gone

Where have all the vendors gone long time passing, where have all the vendors gone, long time ago.  Gone in acquisitions, everyone…….. (think where have all the flowers gone).

Well over the last three years we have certainly seen the share of M&A activity in the ECM space with top right hand names such as Hummingbird, FileNet and Stellent all going the way of acquisition. Here is a non definitive list of some of the acquisitions that have happened 2006 to 2009.

Date Company / Product Acquired by

Jul 2006

Hummingbird

OpenText

Aug 2006

FileNet

IBM

Nov 2006

Stellent

Oracle

Oct 2007

Meridio

Autonomy

Jan 2008

FAST

Microsoft

Mar 2008

Tower Software

HP

Jan 2009

Interwoven

Autonomy

 

This table in itself makes for interesting reading and we must ask what about the likes of Vignette ? how are they going to fair in this rough and tumble year?

Friday, March 20, 2009

Mr. Autonomy you may kiss the bride

Well the negotiations are over and Autonomy has completed the acquisition of Interwoven. Now the fun begins!

If I go to the Autonomy website it looks a little like an advert for "Big love". Mr Autonomy and the many wives. So how are all these products going to live together? Which product is used and when?

Apart from the sales teams being confused, what is going to happen internally? Naturally when there are multiple people (read products) involved there is going to be tensions and power struggles as to who get the love and attention of the master.

Let's just look at records management. On the site through digging around the following are referenced

Autonomy ControlPoint for SharePoint, could be related to the Meridio suite
Autonomy records management relates to Meridio when linked is clicked
iManage records management from the front page product drop down. Where is meridio?

The marriage has been sealed, now it's time to take the bride home to meet the rest of the family and see how the pecking order pans out. Looking out for some big love.

Thursday, January 29, 2009

Enter the year Autonomy in acquisition mode

So welcome to 2009.

We are in the midst of a global recession. There is a new US President. And the day after inauguration Autonomy has moved to acquire Interwoven. What a start !

So Autonomy has now moved into the ECM space with this acquisition and places them on the Gartner MQ as a serious player. The rationale for the purchase from Autonomy is as follows:

The combination of Autonomy's Meaning Based Computing technologies (IDOL) (with
its ability to understand content) with Interwoven's suite of products (focused
on managing the interactions of people and content) will create a new set of
technologies, updating and enhancing Interwoven's products by significantly
reducing the levels of manual effort now required. These technologies are ready
to address the new need for manage-in-place and extend Autonomy's reach into a
new customer base. Interwoven's products know what the customer interactions
are, and Autonomy's IDOL will allow them to know what they mean.


A full press release is outlined on the Autonomy site

http://www.autonomy.com/content/News/Releases/2009/0122.en.html

Monday, August 18, 2008

ECM What's up with Consolidation?

Consolidation news has been big over the last year and tracking back through some old threads and links has been an interesting catch up.

In general consolidation is a natural occurrence as companies look to dominate market share and the battle for customers. I found a slide deck share from John Mancini (The One Minute ECM Guru series) which covers consolidation very quickly.

What was especially telling was the slides that outlined the number of companies that have been acquired from the likes of OpenText and EMC. Looks more like the local Org chart of the multinational itself. How are they going to get that all together in a single, flexible, scalable platform? Will Consolidation provide you and me any benefits

Better product to create better solutions in a more cost effective manner?
Better Service and reduced complexity across the ECM stack?
Better capability to be able to federate across multiple repositories?

Only time will tell if we are to see a major shift of benefit to the customer.

What I do know is that all this consolidation creates an opportunity for new players to slip into the middle ground, especially now that the Gartner Magic Quadrant now looks more like a sausage in shape as the vendors spread out.

The big opportunity is for players such as Alfresco to get the ground swell going and gain market acceptance of Open Source and get in amongst the large and heavy incumbents with the promotion of a new and exciting model and innovative and flexible architecture.

Microsoft (Already a Gartner player) has the opportunity to take advantage of current consolidation to dominate through a "ECM for the Masses" approach thereby driving mass market adoption of ECM type deployments and pulling through other partners in a cost effective delivery of ECM projects across departments and eventually into the enterprise. The key for them will be what next past the MOSS 2007 release?

Saturday, June 7, 2008

ECM What does consolidation mean for customers?

Consolidation has been happening in the ECM marketplace for some time now. In a previous post I looked at the Gartner Magic Quadrant for ECM over a period of years to see how things had progressed and who was still on and who was off the radar.

If you are interested in this post called Quadrants, consolidation and sausages. Following on from this previous blog entry, I have been wondering what consolidation means for customers? Well here are a couple of thoughts on the situation.

On the positive side vendor consolidation creates a greater opportunity for software to broaden out for the customer, that is, if the vendor is an innovation focused company. Acquisition of smaller companies by a larger one allow the acquiring company to rapidly assimilate innovation and deliver new value through synergy with their existing technology. This creates a 1+1=3 offering for customers, and provides some longevity to the company that has acquired the innovation. Alas this perfection is not always reality.

On the negative side acquisition can also stifle innovation as the big fish gobble up smaller more innovative players, possibly as a blocking play to consolidate their position. Maintenance revenues for these vendors are a large and certain thing, especially when you have a massive target to make, you need to fill up the yearly quota with consistent and repeatable revenue. Often the mantra of management is "no disruption", "no bugs"so that customers are happy and pay out the cheques.

Hopefully there are not too many companies that take this attitude, but have a more balanced outlook and acquire for the betterment of the customer base, to increase their competitive advantage and to drive greater value of product functionality and ease of use for the customer.

After all it is for the customers benefit that we are building all this stuff anyway? Which camp is your vendor in, ask some questions and find out. Be sure not to ask too close to an end of quarter cycle!

Tuesday, May 27, 2008

ECM Open Source Options, what's out there?

Hello, hello, hello is there anybody out there? as "Pink Floyd" would say in Comfortably Numb.
Well for a period of time we were all comfortably numb in the embrace of the multinational vendors as licence sales were pushed like logs into the ECM bonfire, but thankfully since 2000 we have seen the entrance of a couple of contenders into the ECM race that make things interesting. These two contenders in the ECM Open Source corner are Nuxeo and Alfresco.
So lets start with a Wikipedia snapshot of Nuxeo, founded in France 2000.

Nuxeo is a comprehensive free software / open source Enterprise Content Management (ECM) platform. It has been designed to be robust, scalable and highly extensible, by using modern open source Java EE technologies, such as: the JCR, JSF, EJB3, JBoss Seam, OSGi, and a Service Oriented Approach. It can be used to develop both web-based server applications and Rich Client applications.
Also, according to the CMS Watch ECM Suites it is reported tha Nuxeo is a good mid range ECM player (mainly due to its current France and UK only penetration) that has strengths in it's client options, well designed workgroup collaboration tools and it's standards based repository compliance. To quote the CMS Watch ECM Suite on Nuxeo.

Nuxeo offers decent collaborative document management technologies, on a
technically quite open platform. Nuxeo is one of the better options currently
available particularly for its target market of government clients. Except for
Alfresco, it is the only open source ECM option that can be considered for
critical enterprise deployment.

quoted from the CMS Watch ECM Suites Report 2008

Nuxeo currently has over 1,000 deployments, all be it most of them on the older platform variant based on Zope/Python. Now version 5.x is based on a JAVA platform base. Nuxeo's own explanation of the switch to the JAVA platform choice is well documented here.

Next, into the arena comes Alfresco. Founded in 2005 by John Newton, co-founder of Documentum® and John Powell, former COO of Business Objects®. Its investors include the leading investment firms Accel Partners, Mayfield Fund and SAP Ventures.

Alfresco, has certainly been somewhat the darling of the ECM circuit, due in part to the smart marketing expertise that the founders bring to gain visibility of the product. Again to quote from Wikipedia, here is a snapshot of Alfresco.

Alfresco is a free software / open source, open standards, enterprise scale content management system for Microsoft Windows and Unix-like operating systems. Its
design is geared towards users who require a high degree of modularity and scalable performance. Alfresco includes a content repository, an out-of-the-box web portal framework for managing and using standard portal content, a CIFS interface that provides file system compatibility on Microsoft Windows and Unix-like operating systems, a web content management system capable of virtualizing webapps and static sites via Apache Tomcat, Lucene indexing, and jBPM workflow. The Alfresco system is developed using Java technology.

CMS Watch place Alfresco into the "ECM Suite" company category. I remember talking to Alan Pelz-Sharpe about Alfresco at the AIIM Conference in 2006 and have been keeping a watching brief on the product and the company since. In summary CMS Watch have this to say.

In sum, Alfresco is a high-end ECM development platform that happens to run on
an open source business model. As an ECM platform, Alfresco is scalable enough
to slug it out with the best of the competition in some high volume projects,
but at the application level it remains immature. If you are looking for
industry-specific, out-of-the-box solution, you may want to look elsewhere.

The interesting point that I see with Alfresco that it is in fact a commercial concern operating with an Open Source business model. So where is the money? Well there are two aspects. Ongoing service contracts. If you want the enterprise capabilities and resilience then you buy a services and support contact to get into the Network version of Alfresco. Secondly there has to be an IPO coming somewhere, or a possible buy out by a suitor.

As at November 2007 it was claimed by Alfresco’s CEO John Powell that there are now over 29,000 working installations/deployments of Alfresco around the world (50 countries, 20 languages). The dig was that it took IBM/FileNet over 25 years to get close to this number of installations, whereas Alfresco has done it in 2 years.

Here is a reference to Islinton and Alfresco in a previous post.

So a brief look at Nuxeo and Alfresco, some time soon I will look at a feature comparison of Nuxeo and Alfresco from a product and business fit perspective.

Thursday, May 22, 2008

ECM - MOSS 2007 A disturbance in the Force

Reading a Gartner report early in the morning, as you do ! I came across one about MOSS that was almost akin to "A disturbance in the Force". From the key finding section came this comment

Enterprise interest in SharePoint is causing some concern that the enterprise
content management (ECM) market will face a recession.


And further into the document was this very interesting statement.


Another interesting piece was that Enterprises spend billions of dollars on ECM
Software but ask any CEO for the 30 second benefits that they have accrued and
most will struggle for an answer.
So we have interesting times around us folks, we can now blame ECM for global recession ! Yes I know I'm twisting the words, but if we look at the two comments extracted for the report we can see that there has been vast buckets of cash thrown at ECM Software and very little value is realised. Why? Well the technology alone is only an enabler to the overall business process, and the process requires people.

Change Anything anywhere and you need to change behaviours and ways of working. This is an area that naturally resists change, like a Force itself it moves organisations in a way of working as people have tried to do there jobs with what they have.

So now we have a low cost, reasonably high value tool that is easy to use and by all accounts is spreading like wild fire. A disturbance, Yes, recession, Yes for the fat bloated suppliers that delivery less value for more money, but NO for those that figure out how to make it work and compliment MOSS with some other products to get what you need today and to position for tomorrow.

Tuesday, May 20, 2008

ECM core components an overview

So what are the core components of an ECM product set? Well over the years the components have changed, so it is always difficult to get a full definition up front. Based on the various analysts in the market place here is my peg in the ground for ECM core components

Firstly, you need to realise that in this diagram there is a mixture of traditional product features and some supporting services that are supplied by the overall system, such as classification. So let's go through the pieces, some will be very self explanatory so I will not elaborate that much on them as we go through. let's begin:

Records Management - Here we deliver support to the management of both paper and electronic records, areas such as classification and retention and disposal are strong features that need to be delivered. Records management is a big driver, but beware of making it the be all and end all. Any good project should have compliance as a natural outcome to what you are trying to achieve.

Imaging - The capture and storage of paper having transferred the paper into a digital format for long term preservation. The electronic format and storage is perferably in the same repository as the other paper and electronic content from records and document managment but not always the case. You will find imaging is big in the Insurance and Finance sectors by the bucket load and has in the last couple of years had somewhat of a renaissance of sorts as it has been incorporated into a wider ECM play.

Web Content Management - management and control of web site style and content. Traditionally this has been out on its own, but if you look strategically it is just part of a spectrum of contnet that needs to be managed, processes and delivered across the enterprise. Therefore it has now become mainstream in ECM based solutions. Infact if vendor does not have an option here they will not make the quadrant.

Collaboration - Big word. lots of different meanings. Generally collaboration is aligned with portal. The Portal provides the interface to glue together office content and content from other sources such as line of business applications and the wider records and document management repositories. It is all brought together into a collaboration interface. Once again in days gone by we had a Portal market that lived by itself in this area, but now the Portals are also just part of a wider ECM offering.

Classification and Search - A Classification is all about grouping or bringing items together under a common category. An example is in records managemtn where a functional based classification has the hirearchy of Function Activity Task - at the end of the hirearchy folders for containment may or may not be developed. There are many other types of classification that can be built as well, you may hear of classification also called taxonomy. Now Search is well search. In some ECM systems the search is closed into the ECM repository only, meaning that you can only search the scope of contnet in the repository. However more forward thinking and innovative vendors will also offer a search engine that reaches outside of the core ECM repository in to the file system, line of business applications and the web.

Document Managment - The management of electronic documents, can be confused with Imaging for paper to electronic, but at the end of the day is is really about getting those office documents under control and into a repository where we can manage them effectively. Thing secure and relaible storage and access with version control and you are on your way. Yes MOSS 2007 does well here with Office documents.

Print and Distribution - This area covers the Computer Output to Lase Disk (COLD) and enterprise report management (ERM). Generally this is the domain of the top right had quadrant players, but there is also others that are now starting to provide these services on top of a MOSS base, such as ClearView ECM, and Knowledgelake.

Process Managment - covers both workflow (human based with system linkage) and business process managmenet (BPM), which is generally system to system and handles long running buiness processes. These days the two are generally interlinked and workflow tends to handle some form of documents within the overall process that is being managed. This is a area that should be of most interest to you as it is the one area that is the heart of all businesses. See the ECM Model to get a view of what I am trying to get across here

Archival and Storage Management - Archiving denotes the ability to capture and maintain content in a secure and manageable repository for a defined period of time. So retention and dispoal rules generally apply here. Most common forms of archiving around file system archiving and e-mail archiving. Traditional ECM vendors that have come from records and document management have generally had e-mail integration early on, but have in the lst couple of years added e-mail archiving to the mix as demand has driven it. Storage Management denotes the capability to manage storage of the overall respository and to provide soem form of HSM type capabilities. There are not many vendors that can do this other than the software + hardware players such as EMC and HP.

Digital Asset Management - Here we are looking to support the capture, annotation, cataloguing, storage and retrieval of assets, such as digital photographs, animations, videos and music. Digital asset management in ECM is a new thing and while the services to build a DAM system are there they may or may not be realised by the organisation as such. This is one area where specialised solutions are still selling very much like web content management used to.


E-mail management - OK folks, here is the big one. Hands up all those you do not have an e-mail problem. Not too many hands there! Well the big area that is driving is e-mail archiving, but archiving is not records management and the real issue is really around managing the "business transactions" that are flowing through the e-mail systems. Most ECM vendors provide front end integration to Outlook or Notes Mail but rely heavily on the end user for intelligence to get the e-mail into a system. Archiving provides a great vacuum cleaner to capture everything. If there is one area that needs real sorting this is it.

Forms management - Heavily aligned with the process management area you should see this popping up everywhere. There are a lots of e-forms projects on the go with everything from claims process to the basics leave forms. To get value from this area it will be combined with collaboration and the process side. Once again the traditional ECM vendors are pulling the forms into the overall ECM suite.


Well that's all folks, 12 components with a little explaination on each. Good luck out there becuase in the ECM world we all need some.

Monday, April 28, 2008

ECM Alfresco a customer story

Great to see a customer reference to the implementation of Alfresco for records and document management. I have been following Alfresco for some time now and I came across a set of slides from Islington Council in the UK.

Great to see that Open Source is starting to enter into the traditional ECM Market space, especially around records management. The Jeremy Tuck, Islinton's CIO has a slide deck presentation give a good overview of where they were and where they have got including a high level of the process that they went through. Sure it is high level and you need some solid information management background to fill in the gaps, but he has put in his e-mail address for you to contact him if necessary.

CMS Watch have also put Alfresco into their ECM Suite reports and I find that next to Nuxeo it is one of two potentials if you are looking at Open Source for the technology piece of your ECM solution at a reasonable cost.

But there is a warning here folks, while the community edition is free, if you are looking for scalability or DR facilities then you will need to sign up for a per annum support fee for Alfresco. However this is not a bad option when you consider that the annual maintenance cost of any ECM technology runs at 20% per annum.

Thursday, April 24, 2008

HP Enters the ECM Race?

Found an article from Forrester on HP entering the ECM Race (thanks Tower). Click on the link for the full article available form the Tower Software Site.

Forrester states that HP are now confronting the "Four Horsemen" of Enterprise Content Management, guess they mean, EMC, IBM, Microsoft and Oracle ? Just to make sure I did a little googling and found the Forrester ECM 2007 report (thanks Oracle) that indicates this is so, as well as the report noted at the beginning.

But getting back to the overall thought of HP entering the race, what concerns me is how HP are going to compete in the ECM space race? The investment strategy seems to strengthen HP's compliance, archiving and discovery stack, but there is more to the total ECM feature space.

Will HP invest and develop in the other key ECM feature areas? Will they provide a set of "infostructure services" (as opposed to infastructure) to an ECM programme, or are they looking to get out there as an ECM Suite player in their own right. Only time will tell, I would hate to see the Tower Software purchase bury the TRIM engine into the overall HP stack for the sake of just ticking the box on a records management piece.

Guess we are all to stay tuned for the next unfolding in the ECM space race !

Monday, April 21, 2008

Greg the Architect. Is there an ECM link here?

Here is a YouTube link to Greg the Architect. While it deals with SOA (that's Service Orientated Architecture) you could swap out SOA for ECM and still have a great laugh, especially with the blue, red and grey team members.



Great piece of marketing by Tibco and I can identify with the Fisher Price Greg, as a look alike is in my daughters toy box. Don't worry Greg they love you. I find this hilarious viewing and was rolling around on the floor. BTW I am off to get that ECM systems migrated into the hardware software and services, and hardware!!

Thursday, April 10, 2008

Quadrants, consolidation and sausages !

As a point of interest I dug out ye Old Magic Quadrants (here after referred to as"the map") from Gartner covering the ECM vendor landscape over the period 2004 - 2007. Why? well with the recent pre-agreement from HP I was interested to see what I thought the vendor landscape was going to look like and to review what had already come before.

It was an interesting exercise and the following observations are simple snapshots of stacking the quadrants next to each other, far from scientific I know, but makes for some good, quick observations.

2004 There were 22 vendors on the map. Some of these looking back we would arguably question today, such as RedDot? Maybe this was a time where the Web Content Management (WCM) area was still moving along and there was some confusion as to where it stood in the the whole ECM space. Well that quickly got sorted in the 2005 map.

2005 the map is down 4 players to 18 and quickly taking on the shape of a sausage with the spread of vendors from the lower left to the top right. Meridio drops out as well as RedDot due to the lack of spread of functions that are being delivered to classify as a full ECM player. Objective enters into the lower right, obviously they had cash to spare this year; The big change of course was the acquisition of Hummingbird by OpenText. The top right were certainly looking to acquire, or get big enough to stop being acquired by some one else.

2006 held the total number of players as 18, however consolidation was very evident in that IBM went for the big bite on FileNet and the top right has dropped from 8 to 4 players. Looking at the map in the top right IBM and EMC were going neck and neck in the race for the anointed leaders position.

2007 sees the total number of vendors reduced to 17. Stellent has acquired by Oracle; IBM move to the leader position, slightly above and ahead of EMC. Interesting to note that Microsoft have steadily moved to the right and are firmly placed in the visionary quadrant. The sausage is starting also to look a little stretched in the middle as the gap widens between the top and bottom players. Hyland Software have for the last 4 years been steadily moved toward the very centre of the map, not a bad position to be in for expanding out of the US only market.

2008 the prediction is that the number will stay at 17, as HP will enter and Tower Software will be no more. But the big question will be where will HP appear on the Map? Will they be in the compete area of the top right. Guess there are some fast and furious analyst lunches, oops I meant briefings, happening right now !